Can Lawyers Record And Transcribe Phone Calls? 

Are you wondering if a lawyer can record and transcribe a phone call without your knowledge? Accurate recordings and legal transcriptions of phone conversations can be very handy in court proceedings, as these files can provide lawyers with evidence to support their arguments. However, there’s the small matter of knowing if the lawyer can record a phone call

Each state has a different law regarding recorded phone calls, and lawyers should comply with the legal requirements. In addition to the legal aspects, lawyers must also consider the ethical implications of recording phone calls to ensure their actions do not waver from their professional responsibilities and to avoid potential consequences. 

This article reviews the factors lawyers should consider before hitting the record button and how legal transcription services like Ditto can support attorneys in pursuing justice.

In this article, you’ll learn how: 

  • The legality of lawyers recording phone calls depends on one-party or two-party consent laws, which vary by state.
  • While recording calls can provide benefits like evidence preservation, it raises ethical concerns, especially regarding client-lawyer trust.
  • Recorded calls can be transcribed to create official records that lawyers can reference when preparing legal documents.

Can Lawyers Record Phone Calls?

The answer is “it depends,” though it’s not very complicated. Let me elaborate: the legality of lawyers recording phone calls depends on the specific laws in the jurisdiction where they practice. 

For instance, one-party consent laws, which apply to most states, allow lawyers to record phone conversations without informing the other participants as long as the lawyer herself/himself is also a party in the conversation.

On the other hand, some states, like California and Florida, have two-party consent laws, meaning all parties involved in the conversation must agree to the recording; otherwise, the person recording the call shall face the consequences—more on these state laws later. 

Common Scenarios Where Lawyers Record Phone Calls

Setting aside the legality of whether lawyers can record phone calls, what are the scenarios in which it is reasonable to do so?

Although not limited to it, below are some of the common ones.

ScenariosDescription
Client InstructionsLawyers may record calls when clients instruct them to, often to create a clear record.
Sensitive InformationLawyers may record calls discussing confidential information to ensure accuracy and protection.
Complex DiscussionsRecording calls can help lawyers fully understand complex legal issues discussed.
Potential DisputesLawyers may record calls if they anticipate future disputes about the content.
Verbal AgreementsRecording calls can document the terms and conditions of verbal agreements made over the phone.
Witness InterviewsLawyers may record witness interviews to capture statements and prevent misinterpretation accurately.
Client UpdatesRecording client update calls can document shared information and protect against malpractice claims.
Training PurposesLaw firms may record calls for training and quality control, allowing attorneys to provide feedback to junior associates.

As mentioned, in various jurisdictions, one and two-party consent laws are the legal requirements for recording conversations, including phone calls.

In states with one-party consent laws – like Texas and Arizona – only one person in the conversation must permit the recording to be legal. The person who wants to record the conversation can be the one providing consent, meaning they can record the conversation without informing the other participants.

On the contrary, two-party consent laws, which are in effect in states like Massachusetts and Washington, require everyone in a conversation to agree to the recording for it to be lawful.

Under two-party consent laws, everyone in the conversation must consent to the recording. If anyone, including lawyers, violates consent laws, it can result in criminal charges, civil lawsuits, jail time, and fines, with penalties depending on the state.

In California, for example, violating the California Penal Code, Section 632 (Eavesdropping on or Recording Confidential Communications) will result in a fine of up to $2,500 per violation, up to one year in county jail, or both

If the person has a previous conviction, the penalty increases to $10,000 or both jail and a fine.

At this time, 38 states are under a one-party consent law. 

  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • Colorado 
  • District of Columbia
  • Georgia
  • Hawaii
  • Idaho
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Kansas
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Minnesota
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio
  • Oklahoma
  • Rhode Island
  • South Carolina
  • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin
  • Wyoming

Meanwhile, there are 11 states with a two-party consent law.

  • California
  • Delaware
  • Florida
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Montana
  • New Hampshire
  • Pennsylvania
  • Washington

Yes, aside from states with one-party or two-party consent laws, two states—Connecticut and Oregon—have mixed recording of conversation consent laws.

For Connecticut, state law requires one-party consent for in-person recordings while all-party consent for phone recordings to avoid civil liability. 

Oregon, however, is quite the opposite; in-person conversation recordings need consent from all parties to be lawful, while digital communications require consent from single parties only.

Is it Ethical for Lawyers to Record Phone Calls?

This one’s a little complicated, though I’ll relay it as simply as possible.

The ethics surrounding lawyers recording phone calls without the consent of all parties involved are subject to varying regulations across jurisdictions. 

The American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility initially took a strict stance against such recordings in 1974, citing them as “inherently deceitful,” though their position has shifted.

In a 2001 opinion, the Committee withdrew its previous stance by concluding that it would be ethical for lawyers to record conversations with non-clients in jurisdictions where it is legal. 

However, the Committee members disagreed on the ethics of recording conversations with clients without their knowledge, even in jurisdictions where it is legally permissible.

Despite the unclear prohibition, the ABA Committee highlighted that recording client conversations without consent is generally not advisable, as it may break the trust crucial to the lawyer-client relationship. 

Therefore, the Committee suggested that lawyers inform clients before recording conversations to avoid overhearing, except in exceptional circumstances where clients have given up the right to confidentiality.

Is it Advisable that Lawyers Record Phone Calls?

As mentioned above, recording phone calls without consent may seem beneficial for lawyers in preserving evidence. However, the ABA Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility advises against this practice, even when legally permissible, due to the potential damage it can cause to the lawyer-client relationship, especially when the client has a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Trust is crucial in this relationship, and clients may feel betrayed if they discover their lawyer secretly recorded their conversations. Fortunately, this is preventable when lawyers simply inform their clients beforehand about the purpose of the recording. 

Can Recording Phone Calls Benefit Lawyers?

Even though the ABA Committee highlighted that lawyers recording phone calls aren’t very ethical, they can still benefit if it’s done lawfully. Let’s take a look at how:

Have Accurate Records

A phone call recording is as good as a complete verbatim record—it captures exact words, agreements, and statements—which provides lawyers with accurate records of conversations, which can be very useful in an ongoing case.

Such precise documentation can reduce the chances of conflicting recollections during a legal matter. Putting that aside, call recordings can also hold individuals accountable for their commitments, strengthening a lawyer’s case. 

Help With Evidence Preservation

There’s nothing better than being fully equipped for war. The same goes for legal proceedings. 

Concrete proof of statements can save lawyers a lot of trouble and support their arguments. As mentioned before, call recordings can serve as verbatim accounts of what was said, which means these recordings can impeach the credibility of witnesses inconsistent with their testimonies.

In addition, the ability to present a recording as evidence gives lawyers a way to protect their client’s interests in the face of conflicting claims. 

Help Save a Lot of Time

Rather than spending hours drafting notes for important details, lawyers can simply refer back to the recorded conversations and swiftly review important statements, agreements, or facts without the time-consuming documentation.

The time saved through recording can be better allocated to developing solid legal strategies, conducting in-depth research, and more. As a result, lawyers can deliver more effective representation throughout an ongoing legal matter.

Can Verify Witness Credibility

When a witness says something over the phone, having a record of their words can greatly help assess their testimonies’ reliability. For instance, if the witness contradicts their previous statements, the recordings can be evidence of their initial claims. Are the witnesses being inconsistent with their statements? Lawyers may use these recordings to highlight issues that may otherwise be difficult to prove. 

What if it’s the other way around? What if a witness maintains a consistent narrative throughout the case? Then, the recorded phone call can help solidify their credibility and support their testimonies.

Can Protect Against Malpractice Claims

Having hold of a recorded phone call can serve as evidence to disprove allegations such as misrepresentation or failure to obtain informed consent. Lawyers can use the recordings to prove that they acted according to professional standards, provided accurate advice, and fully explained the legal implications of the matter.

However, the protection offered by recordings goes beyond helping lawyers; it also serves as a deterrent to potential claimants who may be less likely to pursue allegations when faced with the prospect of a recorded conversation.

Legal transcripts are essential for creating official records of call recordings, depositions, and court proceedings. Lawyers can easily submit recorded phone calls to professional transcription services, like Ditto Transcripts, to generate written transcripts with over 99% accuracy.

The transcribed recording can be an accessible document that lawyers can reference when preparing legal briefs, motions, or other court filings. One can agree that being able to find facts within the transcript quickly can save lawyers valuable time and ensure that no crucial details are overlooked. 

Transcription is essential in court proceedings, but its advantages are not limited to that. Here are some of the benefits of getting expert, reliable legal transcription:

Accuracy

Accurate, reliable transcription services provide high-quality transcripts that capture every conversation detail, benefiting the law firm by seamlessly integrating them into their procedures. 

There’s no need to comb through transcripts looking for errors to correct; download the file from the provider’s servers and use it for anything you need. However, the importance of accuracy is not limited to convenience.

The consequences of legal transcription inaccuracies go beyond embarrassed laughter and the promise of correction as soon as possible. Legal transcripts are frequently used in court hearings and other legal proceedings; that means errors can have a commensurately heavier impact than normal transcription errors in any other circumstances. Crucial evidence can be thrown out, cases derailed, and the justice system compromised. 

Expertise And Focus

The legal industry is notorious for legalese, a specialized form of writing employed by lawyers and other legal industry members to write and discuss laws, legal definitions, applicable terms, and other legal subjects. This writing style uses formal archaic terms, overcomplicated sentences, unfamiliar abbreviations, redundant clauses, and other uncommon language structures.

Now, lawyers, paralegals, and other legal professionals typically don’t have problems dealing with complex legal terms; legal knowledge is their bread and butter. However, their time and energy are better spent on legal workloads, like preparing cases and meeting clients, than transcribing audio recordings.

It’s more than knowing how to type without looking at your keyboard. Legal audio transcription requires experience in addition to listening and typing skills. This is why companies like Ditto are in high demand.

We know our way around a legal conversation, and our transcribers have extensive knowledge of legal procedures. We can transcribe recordings according to your specifications, ensuring efficiency and accuracy while offering fast turnaround times. High-quality legal transcription services like ours understand how various legal formatting guidelines work.

We also take the burden of transcription off the firm’s workload, allowing them to focus on core tasks for the business. 

Time Savings

Outsourcing to professional legal transcription companies will get you the best transcription results with arguably better quality, faster turnaround times, and higher accuracy than having your paralegals do it. 

Patrick W., lawyer and Ditto client, has experienced the benefits of outsourcing transcription to Ditto Transcripts. 

“I’ve been a lawyer for ten years,” he says, “and am grateful to have found Ditto. Their friendly staff can transcribe much faster and more accurate than any of our paralegals. Now that my team has more time, they can help me with other aspects of the case.” 

Aside from time savings, Patrick values such features like: 

  • Professional team of legal transcriptionists educated in the legal field.
  • Certified documents for use in trials. 

All these benefits from Ditto come at a fraction of the cost of hiring a paralegal. Speaking of costs—

Affordability

Transcription costs and Rates

Aside from assigning important but non-core business tasks to proven experts, outsourcing legal transcription can save legal institutions money. 

Ditto Transcripts offers the highest-quality, accurate transcripts in the industry today. However, our fees are very reasonable for our services. Our standard rate is $1.75 per audio minute, with turnaround times between three to five business days. We also offer rush services and longer delivery times for more economical rates. 

Category A includes what we call single-person narratives or interviews involving only one person, such as notes from hearings or individual client meetings. 

Category B pertains to recordings featuring three or more participants or those with considerable background noise or low audio quality, like depositions involving multiple attorneys and seminars. 

Verbatim transcripts incur an additional fee of 25 cents per minute. Since audio quality can affect the time needed for transcription, the service recommends contacting them directly to get precise cost estimates and pricing for same-day services.

Highest Levels Of Security

I can’t speak for other providers, but here at Ditto, security is one of our most important considerations. That’s why we’ve taken steps to achieve CJIS-compliant security—something that not all transcription services can claim. 

Additionally, all files are protected by the following protocols:

  • Detailed Reporting and Tracking Features
  • Individually Defined User Access Levels
  • Individual User Names, Passwords, and PINs (immediate deactivation upon request)
  • Scaled Network Redundancy
  • Virtual Private Network (VPN) Integration
  • Dedicated Data Centers
  • Encrypting All Data With SSL 256-bit Encryption
  • Employee Background Checks
  • Willing To Sign Non-Disclosure Agreements

So, what are you waiting for? Get our services now and experience the industry’s best legal call transcription service.

Ditto Transcripts is a CJIS-compliant Denver, Colorado-based transcription services company that provides fast, accurate, and affordable transcripts for individuals and companies of all sizes. Call (720) 287-3710 today for a free quote, and ask about our free five-day trial.

Looking For A Transcription Service?

Ditto Transcripts is a U.S.-based HIPAA and CJIS compliant company with experienced U.S. transcriptionists. Learn how we can help with your next project!